Re: CLP source vs. CLLE source -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: CLP source vs. CLLE source
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:19:41 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Booth Martin wrote:

Why/when would a programmer choose CLLE over CLP?  Or CLP over CLLE?


Given my druthers ... I would choose CLLE over CLP.

1. You can call procedures in CLLE.
2. CLLE programs are easier to debug (using SEP & such).
3. You can create CLLE procedures and bind them to and into other ILE
programs.

david

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.