RE: CLP source vs. CLLE source -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: CLP source vs. CLLE source
From: "Richter,Steve" <Steve.Richter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:42:27 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>



-----Original Message-----
From: Booth Martin [mailto:booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 4:12 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: CLP source vs. CLLE source

Why/when would a programmer choose CLLE over CLP?  Or CLP over CLLE?


the editor defaults to lowercase. and the strdbg debugger works better. 

also, you can use CALLPRC in CLLE and cannot in CLP. CALLPRC is good for the 
obvious reasons, but also it allows you to break out, in a small way, of the 
max 10 character object name box.  

-Steve

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.