And if it's pure data entry that's needed, green screen is better.
However, a lot of users aren't doing that as much. The concept of
information workers, rather than data processors, is growing. People
that use information for their jobs, and not streams of numbers.

There will always be a need for data entry, and green screens will
always be the best. I wonder if, in the age of EDI and data movement,
the need for data entry is as high as it once was.

On 9/13/07, Steve Landess <sjl_abc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Steve -

Rob will call me a dinosaur (he has probably called me worse things), but I
agree.
One hundred percent!

And in my informal surveys within my clients, EVERYONE who has ever done
data entry agrees with what you said.

Browser-based is never as efficient as green screen at pure data entry.
Period.

- sjl

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Moland" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 10:12 AM
Subject: Thin Clients


While not necessarily limited to the functionality of thin clients, I get
a regular "personal" and in my face reminder of using the wrong tool. Make
no mistake, I love working with my PC and its application all day long but
"there are those times".

When your job depends on the through-put of work that people who report to
you can get through a system, it becomes clear to you that political
correctness is your enemy.

My background in accounting and company paper flow gives me a more
been-there-done-that way of looking at what counts, and I think to ask
those who have to use these system if they see what I see.

I haven't had to worry about my pay being based on such an environment for
a long long time and that is great.

One of the many things I do is to keep and maintain a software use
authorization database for a software company. Some of their customers
have hundreds of in-store Iseries boxes. For many of the cpu additions and
changes my browser based software over our local intranet is about as fast
as it could be in response time and the design paid good attention to
through put.

However, every once in awhile I get a list of dozens of changes and it is
when I'm trying to get out the door, or the requestee forgot to get a new
batch of boxes authorized and they are stuck in finishing the many
software loads they need to do now. I don't begrudged the requests because
that's part of what the service is.

At that point I am reminded of the differences between browser based and a
few other green screen things I work on. Every time I have to take my
hands off the keyboard to use the mouse I want to throw it across the
room. I'm a fast and accurate two-handed typist and I miss the buffered
reliable "type type, ENTER, type, tab, etc." that makes for real through
put production. When I have to work on one those lists in a hurry my hands
are sweating before I finish.

And I have to tell you I've really tried to help the situation by buying
and discarding a bunch of mice in order to find one that is responsive
enough but not overly responsive. I really miss the take no prisoner
positive keyboard feedback of the old IBM 5250 90 Pound terminals.

The browser app has lots of "cute" features but "cute" suffers badly you
got to get the job done NOW. It's wonderful for the less than trained user
and suppose if I was responsible for having to employ some of the poor
quality workers out there I would think differently.

regards
Steve Moland


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.