Re: Thin Clients

[Trevor Perry <trevor@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Joe

I used "emulator, newlook, PSC/400" because Paul referred to them all
previously. I suggest the green is moldy, but not anything refaced - which
would include newlook or PSC/400. Sorry for any inferences otherwise.

Trevor


On 9/14/07 12:47 AM, "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > From: Trevor Perry
> >
> > Paul, there are so many possibilities to solving this business problem. If
> > you continue to think with your green brain - there will never be a
> > solution
> > other than a foreman keying in data into a terminal, 5250 emulator,
> > newlook, or PSC/400.
> >
> > I wonder if a green brain means it is moldy (or mouldy)?
>
> I've pretty much stayed out of this conversation, but now Trevor you're
> going out of your way to pull me into it.  You're equating PSC/400 with
> "moldy", and as usual when you blow smoke like this, you're just way out of
> your league.
>
> As it turns out, since PSC/400 works in a browser it happens to work quite
> well with non-traditional reader devices such as handheld scanners.  The
> reason it works so well is that there are a wide variety of such devices
> (scanners, RFID readers, and so on) that communicate via HTTP.
>
> This is not "moldy", it's "correct".  Data is read/scanned/spoken or keyed
> and then transmitted via perhaps the most widely used protocol in the
> industry.  Simple, efficient, elegant.  That's why so many device vendors
> support a browser interface.
>
> Anyway, I don't know why you decided to drag me into this, unless it was
> simply to get a rise out of me by making snide remarks about my products.
> Please do me a favor and quit referencing me or my products in any of your
> comments.  We'll all be the better for it.
>
> Joe