Re: Building a logical file with 1 member over a physical file with manymembers -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Building a logical file with 1 member over a physical file with manymembers
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:44:53 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

1 - Can anyone get partitioned tables to work if they do not have the
salty "DB2 Multi System" product? I have no intent to spread my table
over multiple systems but IBM decided to limit partitioned tables to only
those systems that have that. If you can't, try submitting a DCR on that.
I went up to Rochester and brought that up to a few people.

2 - Can partitioned tables get around the limitations of 32 members? For
example, if I have a column marked DIVISION and I partition the table
based on the value of DIVISION, and I have 36 divisions will it hurl?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

AW: Building a logical file with 1 member over a physical file withmanymembers , BirgittaHauser

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.