Re: AW: Building a logical file with 1 member over a physical file withmanymembers -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: AW: Building a logical file with 1 member over a physical file withmanymembers
From: CRPence <crp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:03:28 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

As I understand it, partitioning is implemented on the multi-system support. That is, the DB2 multi-system had implemented key partitioning support already [across systems versus on the same system]. So adding partition support primarily for enabling getting around row limitations seems acceptable to require the additional feature. I believe purchase of that sfw feature also serves as a trigger implying a complex DB2 environment; if local partitioning in DB2 for i5/OS is positioned as, for use in overcoming the row limit, I guess that could be considered complex.

Regards, Chuck

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.