Re: Model numbers that can/cannot have LPAR 0 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Model numbers that can/cannot have LPAR 0
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:34:15 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

James,

I think you're still trying to go about this wrong. You're trying to play
the model game to determine lpar number. You really need to look at the
detail provided by the other poster that uses the APIs. Not only does the
old 500 AS/400 vs newer i5 5XX boxes add to the confusion but what's to
stop IBM from announcing something similar in the future? Or doing
something really weird like coming out with an I25 for a custom 525 model
tailored for Infor (BPCS) like the custom models for SAP, etc?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Model numbers that can/cannot have LPAR 0 , James Lampert

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.