Re: Quantify processing wasted by lots of little jobs... -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Quantify processing wasted by lots of little jobs...
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 15:31:41 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I don't think you're going to justify it based on that. Basically you're
either trying to reduce load on your i, or, trying to get the data to the
customer NOTICEABLY faster. That would be a tough sell.

I'd like to get the trigger phobic people here to stop these NEP's that
perpetually check for mods and they process the changed record(s).

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Quantify processing wasted by lots of little jobs... , Wilt, Charles

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.