RE: Quantify processing wasted by lots of little jobs...

["Wilt, Charles" <WiltC@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Both actually.

Or at least I'd hope to get better efficiency and thus better throughput from the box.

We're only dealing with a 810-2465 with 750 CPW.

I can't believe creating 5000-6000+ jobs in a day wouldn't have a noticeable effect on total
throughput.

Charles

> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 3:32 PM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: Re: Quantify processing wasted by lots of little jobs...
>
> I don't think you're going to justify it based on that.  
> Basically you're either trying to reduce load on your i, or, 
> trying to get the data to the customer NOTICEABLY faster.  
> That would be a tough sell.
>
> I'd like to get the trigger phobic people here to stop these 
> NEP's that perpetually check for mods and they process the 
> changed record(s). 
>
> Rob Berendt


This e-mail transmission contains information that is intended to be confidential and privileged.  If you receive this e-mail and you are not a named addressee you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this communication without the consent of the sender and that doing so is prohibited and may be unlawful.  Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected.  After replying, please delete and otherwise erase it and any attachments from your computer system.  Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.