RE: Improving SQL Update perfomance -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Improving SQL Update perfomance
From: "Walden H. Leverich" <WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:13:36 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

SETOBJACC - have not heard it is a NOOP -

It's not, I was smoking dope. :) I had a conversation w/a friend last
night and we determined that what I was remembering is that SETOBJACC
does not pin the object in memory, it simply pages it into memory at the
time the command was run. If you want to emulate pinning it in memory
then load it into a memory pool that doesn't have contention. Sorry for
the confusion.

-Walden

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.