RE: Shouldn't WDSC include SCM?

["Porterfield, Sean" <sporter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: Joe D

> As much as I liked working with change management (Turnover)
> in a prior life, we would never be able to justify the cost
> for our 3 man shop.  And in many (most) ways it would be overkill.
>
> I would be happy with a 'Source Control Manager' that simply
> did two things:
> 1 - Allow source to be checked in/locked & checked
> out/unlocked by developer with change notes
> 2 - Maintain a revisions library to allow us to see prior copies
>
> I just want to avoid source code contention and have a
> complete history.
>
> It is something we would pay for from a vendor, or contribute
> to the design and coding of if it were an open source project.

I'm not sure what your budget is, and I know that MKS Implementer does more than what you requested, but I seem to recall that it was not extremely expensive if you only wanted change management.  It was certainly the lowest quote we got when comparing "the big 3".
--
Sean Porterfield

This email is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged.  If you have received this message in error or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender immediately and delete this email message from your computer as any and all unauthorized distribution or use of this message is strictly prohibited.  Thank you.