Re: STRASPBAL

[Marc Rauzier <mrauzier@xxxxxxx>]

Le: 05 déc. 2007, vous écriviez dans:
gmane.comp.hardware.ibm.midrange: 

> The reason I wanted to run the TRCASPBAL and the STRASPBAL *USAGE
> was some parity sets seem to be busier than others.  And it still
> seems thus, 
>
>                Size    % 
> Unit  Type      (M)  Busy
> ...
>   53  4327    52923     2
>   54  4327    52923     2
>   55  4327    52923     2
>   56  4327    52923     2
>   57  4327    52923     2
>   58  4327    52923     2
>   59  4327    52923     3
> ...
>   79  4327    52923    17
>   80  4327    70564    20
>   81  4327    70564    17
>   82  4327    70564    11
>   83  4327    70564    14


Ha yes, you are right, it looks strange.
Is the elapsed time of the panel long enough ? I mean, try to look at 
the same panel with a 5 minutes elapsed time.