Polluted local data area -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Polluted local data area
From: James Lampert <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:07:20 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

We've got a server program that uses its job's *LDA for persistent storage. And we've got an instance of it that's getting a polluted *LDA from launch.

*LDAs don't by any chance get inherited from submitting jobs, do they?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Polluted local data area , Al Barsa
Re: Polluted local data area , Brian Johnson

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.