Re: V6R1 Info -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: V6R1 Info
From: "Lukas Beeler" <lukas.beeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:19:16 +0100
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Jan 30, 2008 7:59 PM, Steve Richter <stephenrichter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

disappointing. the system retains its clunkiness. 10 char object names,
16meg user spaces, ILE doesn't reflect like .NET assemblies do Because of

Well, i'll agree on the "disappointing" tone. But even V5R4 didn't
bring much new stuff to the table.

Compared to the feature list of WS2008, V6R1 didn't bring much new
stuff to the table. Of course there are improvements that might be
interesting for companies bigger than mine (e.G. Mike Crump thinks a
new FC adapter is great news, while i couldn't care less).

I really hope the POWER6 hardware will bring a bit more punch to the
table, and finally make the entry level systems usuable.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.