Re: Woes on ANZOBJCVN... -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Woes on ANZOBJCVN...
From: Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:19:45 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Don wrote:

Joe,

Please clarify. As I'm reading this, you say no observability since
4.5...but from what I'm hearing from IBM, even though observability was
removed in the 5.1-4 range, it was still "there" for upgrade purposes...but
observability 4.5 and before was actual removal...ergo, if the observability
factor was removed 5.1-5.4...there's no issue. Pre-5.1, there's a issue
potential... Is this what you intended to say?

Quoting IBM:

"Thus a program lacks sufficient creation data for conversion only if the program or at least one of its modules was created for OS/400® V4R5 or an earlier release AND creation data was explicitly removed."

This tells me you had to compile back to V4R5 (which you could have done from no later a release than V5R2) and then subsequently remove observability.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Woes on ANZOBJCVN... , Mark S. Waterbury

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.