Re: Woes on ANZOBJCVN...

["Mark S. Waterbury" <mark.s.waterbury@xxxxxxx>]

Hi, Joe:

Or, you could have compiled it on V4R5 (or earlier) and then never 
recompiled it since then.

And then, if you (foolishly) removed observability, you lose.

Mark

> Joe Pluta wrote:
> Don wrote:
>   
> > Joe,
> >
> > Please clarify.  As I'm reading this, you say no observability since
> > 4.5...but from what I'm hearing from IBM, even though observability was
> > removed in the 5.1-4 range, it was still "there" for upgrade purposes...but
> > observability 4.5 and before was actual removal...ergo, if the observability
> > factor was removed 5.1-5.4...there's no issue.  Pre-5.1, there's a issue
> > potential...  Is this what you intended to say?
> >   
> >     
> Quoting IBM:
>
> "Thus a program lacks sufficient creation data for conversion only if 
> the program or at least one of its modules was created for OS/400® V4R5 
> or an earlier release AND creation data was explicitly removed."
>
> This tells me you had to compile back to V4R5 (which you could have done from no later a release than V5R2) and then subsequently remove observability.
>
> Joe
>
>