Re: Elimination of PDM/SEU in favor of WDSC/RDI -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Elimination of PDM/SEU in favor of WDSC/RDI
From: "Mark Villa" <iseries.4.me@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:42:24 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

and we should all be using WDSC/RDI for development

Hi all,
If I need to connect to 30 boxes and make one source code change in
two member "types" & compile, because these are a "special case" and
must actually occur on the box, not deployed, how much time do I need
with each tool and what might be the pros and cons of the two tools?

1) WDSC/RDI for development

2) PDM

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.