|
Test to see how the ERRSFL keyword affects behavior. I believe if you
specify that keyword at the top of your dds specs you will find that all
your errors are available on the status line (use the page keys to see
each of them,) I believe it also stops the need for the user to press
the enter key to proceed.
Jeff Young wrote:
The ERRMSG keyword will display the message text on the message line, and set the DSPATR(RI PC) attributes on the field.
If there are multiple ERRMSG conditions, the first condition that is met will display the message. All others will just set the field attribute to RI.
The ERRMSG keyword also implicitly will not allow the contents of the screen display to change.
Hope this helps,
Jeff Young
Sr. Programmer Analyst
IBM -e(logo) server Certified Systems Exper - iSeries Technical Solutions V5R2
IBM Certified Specialist- e(logo) server i5Series Technical Solutions Designer V5R3
IBM Certified Specialist- e(logo)server i5Series Technical Solutions Implementer V5R3
----- Original Message ----
From: John McKee <jmmckee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 1:38:51 PM
Subject: Re: Display file puzzlement
Thanks everyone for the help. I was trying to come up with what I had
done from
memory last night. Not as handy as being in front of the screen. I now have
PUTOVR at the record level, conditioned by an indicator. At the field
level, I
have OVRATR and DSPATR, also conditioned by an indicator. When I tested a few
minutes ago, there was no difference. It was only when I commented out the
ERRMSG that the DSPATR worked. I am not so sure I like how ERRMSG works
anyway, since it locks the keyboard and only one error is shown.
Quoting Simon Coulter <shc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On 18/04/2008, at 10:15 AM, John McKee wrote:
Both PUTOVR and DSPATR are conditioned by the same indicator usedRead what I wrote! Read what the Information Centre says about
to condition
the ERRMSG keyword.
PUTOVR! You need OVRATR!
Error indicator is initially set OFF.A 23 DSPATR(HI RI PC)
I thought DSPATR went on the second line, but tried first one
anyway. Made no
difference.
A O 28
will cause a compile error. However,
A 23
A O 28 DSPATR(HI RI PC)
will not. Therefore ...
Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists
http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
--
---------------------------------
Booth Martin
http://www.Martinvt.com
---------------------------------
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.