Re: IFS save issue -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: IFS save issue
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:07:42 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

400,000 one hundred byte objects may take less time than 200 one terabyte
objects.
Also, you might want to check the joblog and the settings for Default Wait
Time. Waiting two minutes an object to see if someone frees up a lock
tends to drag out the time.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: IFS save issue , John Candidi

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.