RE: IFS save issue

["John Candidi" <jacandidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Actually, where would I find that setting? We are at 5.2. Is that on the SAV
command?

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Candidi
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:24 AM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: IFS save issue

The additional 200 objects are very small and probably about the same size
as most of the 400,000 objects. I haven't checked the joblog for the default
wait time but I can say that no one was on the system at the time we were
running it. Is there an optimal setting for the default wait time?

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:08 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: IFS save issue

400,000 one hundred byte objects may take less time than 200 one terabyte 
objects.
Also, you might want to check the joblog and the settings for Default Wait 
Time.  Waiting two minutes an object to see if someone frees up a lock 
tends to drag out the time.

Rob Berendt