Re: Trigger question

[James Lampert <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Buck wrote:

> This has been discussed here before, I think.  I like to put a surrogate 
> program in ADDPFTRG.

I'm sorely tempted to make an extremely lewd comment.

Seriously, I've also been sorely tempted to put surrogates in on not 
only my workflow trigger but "inbound interface" triggers, but worry 
about the overhead of an additional call, particularly when the trigger 
program itself is sufficiently big and complex to affect performance.

Incidentally, with the surrogate approach, does setting the activation 
group to *CALLER (usually for performance, but sometimes for the sake of 
persistent statics) by any chance defeat the whole exercise of using a 
surrogate?