Re: Command programming

[CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx>]

  InfoCenter is *much* improved.  However I am still very partial to 
_reference_ manuals where the subject matter warrants.  For example, 
designing and creating command definition objects and related features 
[validity checking & choice programs, etc.], to provide an interface to 
a CPP.  And I very much dislike the .pdf for manuals, which is all there 
is from InfoCenter for manuals; I still prefer BookManager over PDF. 
The negative moniker will be hard to let go, regardless of improvements, 
even if only because using such monikers makes me grin as I write; like 
writing either WinBlows or WinDoze for another function with a long 
history of constantly frustrating me :-)  So as long as I have better 
luck using Google to find what I want in InfoCenter, I will not look on 
the InfoCenter fondly.

Regards, Chuck

Dan wrote:
> CRPence wrote:
>
> > InfoCrap. Need I say more? ;-)  <<SNIP>>
>
> I thought I remembered that InfoCenter was vastly improved a few
> releases ago.  I do remember pining for the old CD-ROMs from the V3
> days when InfoCenter first came out.  <<SNIP>>