Re: Running out of twinax consoles... -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Running out of twinax consoles...
From: Pat Barber <mboceanside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:48:24 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Your lack of experience is hardly a reason to slam a
product that you apparently have very little knowledge
of.

I can't believe your ideas on dot matrix printers.

Are you aware of multipart forms ?

Lukas Beeler wrote:

Yeah, but Twinax was flaky, problematic, slow, without available
replacement parts, etc. pp.

Matrix printers are even worse.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Running out of twinax consoles... , Lukas Beeler

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.