On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Pat Barber <mboceanside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Your suggestion to kill a technology makes no sense, unless there is an
excellent business case for doing so.

It was a a jest - i doubt IBM would ever do that, they'd be stupid if they did.

I still think one should migrate away from Matrix printers whenever possible.

Laser printers are quite expensive to operate and a basic dot matrix
printer(ie:Lexmark 2481) can operate for years with little more than
a ribbon change. You can't say the same for a laser.

Forms printed with matrix printers require (expensive) preprinted
forms, that are pretty inflexible - if your business needs change you
might need to throw away hundreds of preprinted forms. With laser
printers you can use overlays and change output as desired by your
business - the business can make the decisions instead of the
technology.

Yeah, lasers require maintenance, perhaps more than matrix printers.
But looks are important - i see less and less papers printed using
matrix printers - yet most of the old school AS/400 shops still use
them. And i've never seen companies which have switched ERP solutions
to stay with matrix printers.


This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.