On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Pat Barber <mboceanside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Your suggestion to kill a technology makes no sense, unless there is an
excellent business case for doing so.

It was a a jest - i doubt IBM would ever do that, they'd be stupid if they did.

I still think one should migrate away from Matrix printers whenever possible.

Laser printers are quite expensive to operate and a basic dot matrix
printer(ie:Lexmark 2481) can operate for years with little more than
a ribbon change. You can't say the same for a laser.

Forms printed with matrix printers require (expensive) preprinted
forms, that are pretty inflexible - if your business needs change you
might need to throw away hundreds of preprinted forms. With laser
printers you can use overlays and change output as desired by your
business - the business can make the decisions instead of the
technology.

Yeah, lasers require maintenance, perhaps more than matrix printers.
But looks are important - i see less and less papers printed using
matrix printers - yet most of the old school AS/400 shops still use
them. And i've never seen companies which have switched ERP solutions
to stay with matrix printers.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.