Re: AW: DDL Discussion continued -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: AW: DDL Discussion continued
From: "Charles Wilt" <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:21:39 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Dave Odom <Dave.Odom@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Indexes are a different animal than regular LFs. A radix index, for example, is WAAAAY different than a old style LF or even an SQL View, even though it says it's a LF.

I don't think so.

An SQL index and a keyed DDS logical are both radix indexes. Thus the
reason you can share the "access path" (aka index) created via SQL
with a DDS defined logical.

Now an SQL EVI index is indeed a way different animal than a radix index.

Charles Wilt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.