Re: Telnet concerns from auditors -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Telnet concerns from auditors
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:38:02 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Adam Glauser wrote:

I should probably add "on a public network" to the end of that.

True, but the encryption issues I've been hearing about have nothing to do with the network being open to the public.

Take a look at the PCI (credit card industry) requirements ... they mandate secure authentication (if not traffic) on internal networks.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Telnet concerns from auditors , macwheel99

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.