Re: I will stop calling it an AS/400 when . . . [ thiscondition is met ] -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: I will stop calling it an AS/400 when . . . [ thiscondition is met ]
From: Dave McKenzie <davemck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 09:23:36 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Because at the time we had no inkling of the insanity IBM execs were
capable of.

If we knew then what we know now, perhaps we would have refused to take
that first step on the slippery slope and defiantly called it S/38
forevermore.

--Dave

rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Why did you start calling it an AS/400 and not a S/38?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.