From: Lukas Beeler
Yes. And i agree that this has lots of disadvantages, but isn't
this [disparate systems] the same on every system/platform?


That may be a rhetorical question, but I'll respond - just in case not. Disparate systems leads to more training, more maintenance, more problems, more cost. A couple of disparate systems may double your capacity, but quadrupal your complexity.

I think it's IT's greatest challenge, and often it's biggest nightmare. But I see it more as a logistics and human relations issue than a technical one. And IBM may promote "i" as a means of consolidating disparate workloads, but that's still like sewing parts of mobile homes together from different manufacturers on a single lot. You may have a single shelter, but the roof still leaks.

Nathan.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.