On 17-Feb-09, at 9:29 PM, midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

but it seems to
me that updating RPG and not providing a GUI was putting the cart before the
horse. IBM got that wrong. Of course I am speaking with the benefit of
hindsight.

You bet it's hindsight. RPG IV was introduced what - some 13+ years ago. The development cycle was at least 3 years (I don't recall now). The GUI options at the time would have been an X-term type interface or slaved PCs in client/server mode - neither of which were under serious consideration in Rochester. Things like the browser that we think of today when we say GUI weren't really out there at the time.

The timing of RPG IV was in many ways unfortunate - if we'd started it some three years later it might have been very different.

Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact copyright@midrange.com.

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.