RE: QNTC alternative -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: QNTC alternative
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:09:17 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

After hearing about having to IPL and whatnot in order to use NFS can
someone explain again to me why it is oh so much better than QNTC?

Item two: If the IPL concerns can be allayed by not using the default
parameters on the MOUNT command, then what parameters are the
recommendation?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: QNTC alternative , Bill Burnet

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.