RE: Alternatives to Iron Mountain -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Alternatives to Iron Mountain
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:10:48 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Which brings up another point. What if your target machine was running
6.1, as part of the phase in, and your source machine was still running
5.4? Does one now say "well, this is as good as an excuse as any to go to
6.1."?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Alternatives to Iron Mountain , Bryce Martin
Re: Alternatives to Iron Mountain , John Jones

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.