Re: DSPOJBD (field length changes) V5R3 to V5R4 help needed -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: DSPOJBD (field length changes) V5R3 to V5R4 help needed
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 11:27:52 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Mark,

Read the fine print "field lengths are different". It didn't say new
fields were added to the end of the file. Do you REALLY want to use
LVLCHK(*NO) on that, or was it you and not rodents who ate the pretty
purple mushrooms growing on my compost pile?

Rob Berendt

Follow-Ups:

Re: DSPOJBD (field length changes) V5R3 to V5R4 help needed , Brian Johnson

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.