Re: SQL Table Design -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: SQL Table Design
From: James Perkins <jrperkinsjr@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 10:30:55 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Mmmm, interesting. I thought about that but just from a sorting stand-point
and thought "I will always want to sort by the name". I'm now questioning
that. I think adding a sequence is brilliant thanks!
--
James R. Perkins
http://twitter.com/the_jamezp

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:08, Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

That looks good. The only other thing that comes to mind is that some
folks add a sequence_number integer to allow sub-categories to be sequenced
within category.

-Nathan.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.