From: Paul Nelson
I guess he's never had a horse get out of the barn.
Or a fox get into the chicken coup ;-)
He may have been looking at it from a high-level IT executive position rather than the technicians responsible for data access and maintenance.
Hosting locations may actually be more secure than on-premise servers - they may put more into infrastructure. They may know more about physical and virtual security than a small to medium business operator.
Running a hosting location under IBM i may have an advantage in object-level security, single-level store, etc.
Part of the sense of security may be that a site is hosted in its own partition, under its own IP address.
-Nathan.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.