LOL Bryce

Again, you didn't grow up with SEU. If you are using I to insert every line - which you did not say directly - then you aren't using SEU as it can be used. Just put an I on the sequence number where you want to start, enter code or a space to keep the line intact, and it will open up the next line for you to type into - just like hitting enter in WDSC. Hey, man, they didn't design WDSC in a vacuum - SEU was in their minds - you can use SEU line commands in WDSC, too.

And if you start typing a command and hit F4, you get all the formatting you want. AND it gives you that extra line, just as it does as I described above.

I am not saying it's better, it's just not as bad as your experience has been. But there is not enough reason for you to investigate, and I understand that. No problem here with that. I just feel a need to confront opinions based on admittedly-limited experience.

Carry on with WDSC! It's a fine IDE. As good as Visual Studio? Not yet, IMO. But they keep working at it.

And I wouldn't use vi for much of anything!! Although I do use TextPad for editing ASP code, albeit with syntax files and the like. It's not bad!!

Regards
Vern

Bryce Martin wrote:
Plus, in WDSC you can type the line as long as you want without worrying how many columns wide you are and the editor will reformat the code to fit inside the proper width. And I can hit the Enter button to get a new line, I don't have to go enter some special command with an I and space and then enter and all that junk. It doesn't matter what you are editing in my mind, its the fact that editing anything in WDSC is more natural to what you use everywhere else including word documents.

Its like linux people who use vi because "its way better"... I used vi exclusively for C++ when I was in college.... ITS NOT BETTER THAN A GUI IDE! haha. feels good to get that out :D


Thanks
Bryce Martin
Programmer/Analyst I
570-546-4777



Kurt Anderson <kurt.anderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
03/12/2010 02:35 PM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
"'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: Change management systems






Seriously?

I hated editing CL in SEU and actually don't mind it in WDSCi. Although 70 lines at a time and color-coding goes a long ways for me. I even use the outline by setting up tags by section (that I never use GOTO on).

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Gibbs
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 10:05 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Change management systems

rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Take a class in the GUI tools. Use it exclusively for a month. See if you change your mind.

While WDSC / RDi / RDp are very good tools, there are still things that PDM is much better at ... editing CL, for instance.

The GUI editors are slow as molasses when it comes to editing CL, but PDM is super fast.

david


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.