Re: QtmmSendMail without QTSMTPxxxx? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: QtmmSendMail without QTSMTPxxxx?
From: "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:06:01 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Mark S. Waterbury wrote:

You should be able to use the UPDPGM command and specify the qualified name of the new service program in the SRVPGM parameter.

Fascinating. Except that there is no SRVPGM parameter on UPDPGM.

There are, however, BNDSRVPGM and SRVPGMLIB parameters, and of the two, the latter seems more likely to be applicable.

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: QtmmSendMail without QTSMTPxxxx? , Mark S. Waterbury
Re: QtmmSendMail without QTSMTPxxxx? , Scott Klement

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.