Mail System Framework Audit Journal -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Mail System Framework Audit Journal
From: "Burns, Bryan" <Bryan_Burns@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:57:25 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I'm trying to prove a negative - that the delays in email delivery to
MS Outlook clients of IBM system i email are NOT being caused by the
system i.

Does the fact that a QZMF journal entry exists, and it's not an entry
type ER (error), and the timestamp is much earlier than the delivery to
the client, rule out the system i?? If not, what is the next "hop", if
you will, after the MSF indicates something has been sent?

Bryan Burns

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Mail System Framework Audit Journal , Jack Kingsley
Re: Mail System Framework Audit Journal , Luis Rodriguez

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.