On 15-Nov-2011 22:13 , John Yeung wrote:
IBM's "Julian dates" have as much to do with *actual* Julian
dates as Julian Lennon.
Most references to a "Julian date" [for IBM i anyhow] likely apply
only to a presentation-format and\or input-format for Gregorian date
values. For example the CHGJOB DATFMT(*JUL) does not change the job to
use the Julian calendar, instead the request merely changes the job to
default the presentation and expectation for input of Gregorian date
values. I am not sure of what if any external interface might expose
the Julian calendar type, except perhaps the SQL JULIAN_DAY scalar;
beyond that, the database [AFaIK still] only supports the Gregorian
calendar [though, with the skipped\missing days accounted\included] for
date calculations. I am not aware of what other than the LOCALE has
exposed the Era calendar type.
Regards, Chuck
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
