|
From: Kirk Goins
Another point a 'user' is someone who has been authenticated by
either the OS or an application that access the OS.
I hate to quibble with an otherwise good point, but a user is an
individual who authenticates against the OS, period. I've read the language
of the license and IBM doesn't bother to qualify it, so why should we?
So a System running say DOMINO where no one other than the
admins log in to the green screen, still need licensing for the number
of 'concurrent' users accessing Domino.
Actually, that may not be the case. It depends on whether the individual
or application is using IBM i authentication or not. Users could be
accessing a Web application and authenticating against a Domino database,
and not be subjected to user based licensing.
A lot of web applications running under IBM i are not subject to extra
license fees because they don't use IBM i authentication, nor do they
require IBM i Access or other client software that is subject to
entitlement.
-Nathan.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.