RE: best way to limit a job -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: best way to limit a job
From: Stefan Tageson <Stefan.Tageson@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 20:45:45 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I'm looking for the best and simplest way to limit how much of the system a particular job will take. Ideally, we would be able to configure a job so that it won't take more than x% of the CPU (as seen on a
WRKACTJOB display).

Hi,
If you happen to have a large multiprocessor partition and also running at 7.1 you can have a look at Workload Groups which limits a job or subsystem to resources allocated to the WG.

https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home?lang=en#/wiki/IBM%20i%20Technology%20Updates/page/IBM%20i%20workload%20groups

stefan.tageson@xxxxxxxx
M +46 732 369934

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: best way to limit a job , Jim Oberholtzer

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.