RE: BARCODE Keyword -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: BARCODE Keyword
From: chris barr <cbarr5011@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:20:00 -0800 (PST)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Jim Franz,

Thanks for the response. Yes I started out with that exact code. However, when
we sent the barcode to the US Postal Service, they said it was too big. That’s
why I added the *UOM (unit of measure) parameter. I figured that .1 of an inch
would shrink it down, but it didn’t. That’s why I’m on this site asking for
help.

thanks,
cb

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: BARCODE Keyword , John McKee
Re: BARCODE Keyword , John McKee

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.