UOM does not influence the barcode height. That is a parameter which I
think I saw in your original post as .9. Try decreasing that number a
little.

John McKee

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:20 PM, chris barr <cbarr5011@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Jim Franz,

Thanks for the response. Yes I started out with that exact code. However, when
we sent the barcode to the US Postal Service, they said it was too big. That’s
why I added the *UOM (unit of measure) parameter. I figured that .1 of an inch
would shrink it down, but it didn’t. That’s why I’m on this site asking for
help.

thanks,
cb
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.