Jim/Pete

What is the performance like? I have tended to steer away from the web based Navigator functions because it seemed so sluggish. Not that the Ops Nav is any speed demon but ...

As a Mac user I would love to have one less Windows based tool to worry about. The new emulator is pretty good and runs well on the Mac - if the browser based Navigator performs that will be great. Then all I have left to get a native version of is RDP!


On 2012-12-07, at 7:47 PM, midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

<snip>

I'm more excited about the movement of most of the DB/2 functions to IBM
Navigator for i because we are very close to leaving the client side
code behind. The work there is not quite complete but i suspect it
won't be long.

Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects


On 12/6/2012 10:45 AM, Pete Massiello - ML wrote:
In addition, I am currently part of the beta team on IBM Navigator for i, and If you are currently using this product, you will want to jump on the next HTTP group PTF that comes out around December 15, because this new version is amazing. Really great UI improvements.

Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.