|
Jim/Pete
What is the performance like? I have tended to steer away from the web based Navigator functions because it seemed so sluggish. Not that the Ops Nav is any speed demon but ...
As a Mac user I would love to have one less Windows based tool to worry about. The new emulator is pretty good and runs well on the Mac - if the browser based Navigator performs that will be great. Then all I have left to get a native version of is RDP!
On 2012-12-07, at 7:47 PM,midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> <snip>Jon Paris
> > I'm more excited about the movement of most of the DB/2 functions to IBM
> Navigator for i because we are very close to leaving the client side
> code behind. The work there is not quite complete but i suspect it
> won't be long.
> > Jim Oberholtzer
> Chief Technical Architect
> Agile Technology Architects
> > > On 12/6/2012 10:45 AM, Pete Massiello - ML wrote:>> In addition, I am currently part of the beta team on IBM Navigator for i, and If you are currently using this product, you will want to jump on the next HTTP group PTF that comes out around December 15, because this new version is amazing. Really great UI improvements.
www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
--
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.