Mike, if you have a solid BP and you pass this by them, what are the
numbers for either system looking like, does one far outweigh the other on
workload consolidation and core pricing.

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Mike,

Some of your terminology is throwing me off. Flex "compute nodes" are not
"blades", for instance. And as far as I know they don't come in 2-core
configurations. It sounds like you may be better off down-sizing from a 550
to a 720, or possibly one 720 for IBM i and another for AIX.

I think that Pure Flex configurations are really geared for very large
data centers and massive parallel compute capacity.

-Nathan





________________________________
From: "Smith, Mike" <Mike_Smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:05 PM
Subject: Pure vs. Power

So, after many year I might have convinced management to upgrade our aging
Power 5 550 machine. I initally was looking at a four core 740, with two
cores for i OS and two to support older AIX workloads. In the end, it
looks like it might only be i OS on Power running on two Power cores. With
some other projects going on in the division, the PureFlex system is being
thrown out as another option. This configuration would have three or four
x86 blades and one Power blade running two cores. The politics of the
situation has me possibly axeing the x 86 blades and looking at a PureFlex
system only with one Power blade. So, I guess what I'm looking for is some
feedback on a 740 with 2 cores or a PureFlex blade with 2 cores. Both
solutions would most likely be using DASD out of our V7000 system. I
haven't seen any configs yet so I can't answer part numbers, memory, etc
but I guess I'm looking for an AS/400/iSeries/system I person who might know
more about the comparision of t
hese two implementations.

Thanks,

Mike.



________________________________
Confidentiality: This transmission, including any attachments, is solely
for the use of the intended recipient(s). This transmission may contain
information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure.
The use or disclosure of the information contained in this transmission,
including any attachments, for any purpose other than that intended by its
transmittal is strictly prohibited. Unauthorized interception of this email
is a violation of federal criminal law. If you are not an intended
recipient of this transmission, please immediately destroy all copies
received and notify the sender.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.