Re: qtemp performance oddity. -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: qtemp performance oddity.
From: Sue Baker <smbaker@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:12:44 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2/27/2013 9:21 PM, DrFranken wrote:

Any ideas? Anyone recognize these symptoms?

Do you have performance data from before and after? You don't mention what the disk response time is. I'd be looking at what the disk service and wait times are. If significantly different, then I'd be checking into the seek counts.

I'm thinking those jobs that use QTEMP are experiencing long seeks so longer disk response times than they used to.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: qtemp performance oddity. , DrFranken

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.