Re: qtemp performance oddity.

I was also wondering if the RAID card is ok. Was it a 2778 or 4778 (first email) ?
What position was the hardware jumper set to on the new RAID card?

Steve

message: 5
date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 12:11:04 -0500
from: DrFranken <midrange@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: qtemp performance oddity.

These 8 17s just replaced 8 7200 RPM 8GB Units (Remember the big black
1.6" think drives?!) and the RAID card from 2741 to 2778.

After the upgrade MANY batch jobs went from 15 seconds to 10 to 20
minutes and signoff for interactive users went from near instant to more
than 2 minutes.

Yes performance reports do show the 8G units at almost exactly 1/2 the
total ops of the 17s. HOWEVER with one exception of a .018 all the 6717s
also show average response times of .020 just like the 17s.

Do you think we have a RAID Card issue here?

_______________


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to
which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.

________________