RE: Performance of large LF access path builds - SSD vs 10K spinny -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Performance of large LF access path builds - SSD vs 10K spinny
From: Sue Baker <sue.baker@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:43:15 +0000 (UTC)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

"Steinmetz, Paul" <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 16 Sep
2014 19:59:28 GMT:

Am I missing something?
Shouldn't the SSD be faster?

Hard to tell. There are lots of variables. The only way to
really understand is to get some pretty detailed performance
statistics. With elapsed time being 16 minutes, it's likely
analyzing PEX traces would be the only way.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Performance of large LF access path builds - SSD vs 10K spinny , Steinmetz, Paul

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.