Yes but that's for something different. I'm not sure if that would be
disruptive to the job attached to the now detached I/O device but I suspect
it might be.
--
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 11:25 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: SAVE 21 remote hmc and pc energy saver
There's also 'allow console takeover' in SST too, right?
Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept 1600 Mail
to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com
From: "Jim Oberholtzer" <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'"
<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 09/29/2014 11:25 AM
Subject: RE: SAVE 21 remote hmc and pc energy saver
Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Yep, IBM thought of that problem.
That's why I insist that all my customers start a console session on the
physical HMC for each partition and just leave it without signing on. That
way when you use a remote connection the local HMC connection is also
started and remains in place in the event of a remote communications
failure
to the HMC.
--
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim
Franz
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 9:35 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: SAVE 21 remote hmc and pc energy saver
Our admin ran a save21 from his laptap remoted into hmc.
All was running well till laptop energy saver blacked out the display.
Was an hour into it.
He went to HMC and had blank screen for console.
Used web access of tape library to monitor activity.
Save 21 kept running, and tape drive was set to autoload. Not using BRMS.
V7r1
It kept running (3 more hours, including load of 2nd tape) and completed
the
save 21 In previous releases I've seen this fail. The CPF5080 has "ignore"
thoughout log.
CPF5140 Diagnostic 70 09/28/14 18:17:56.041199
QWSERROR QSYS 0630 QWSUIEH
Message . . . . : Session stopped
by
a request from device DSP01.
CPF5503 Diagnostic 30 09/28/14 18:17:56.041241
QWSERROR QSYS 0652 QWSUIEH
Message . . . . : Input or Output
request failed. See message CPF5140.
CPF5080 Notify 30 09/28/14 18:18:06.437840
QWSDSMSG QSYS 0546 QMHSNSTA Q
Message . . . . : Display status
message request failed. See message
CPF5263.
Cause . . . . . : Various error
conditions detected. Recovery . . . :
Close the active file, if any, and
see the message CPF5263 for corrective
action. Correct the errors and then
try the request again. Possible choices
for replying to message . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . : I -- Ignore the
request.
*NONE Reply 09/28/14 18:18:06.437844
QMHSNINQ QSYS 0F84 QMHSNSTA Q
Message . . . . : I
Jim Franz
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe,
or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
midrange.com
