RE: QNTC and Windows Server 2012

[Richard Schoen <Richard.Schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

It's not really, but since Terry was commenting about "MS-proprietary" it seemed appropriately funny and you took the bait.  

One could say however that IBM did a semi-proprietary implementation of Netbios because it's never worked 100% :-)

Regards,

Richard Schoen | Director of Document Management Technologies, HelpSystems
T: + 1 952-486-6802
RJS Software Systems | A Division of HelpSystems
richard.schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
www.rjssoftware.com
Visit me on: Twitter | LinkedIn

-----Original Message-----
How would Windows networking be IBM proprietary?

Charles

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Richard Schoen < Richard.Schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Well actually it's probably more like IBM proprietary :-)
>
> Happy CPY-ing !!
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard Schoen | Director of Document Management Technologies, 
> HelpSystems
> T: + 1 952-486-6802
> RJS Software Systems | A Division of HelpSystems 
> richard.schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.rjssoftware.com Visit me on: 
> Twitter | LinkedIn
>
> ------------------------------
>
> message: 5
> date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:18:11 +0000
> from: Winchester Terry <terry.winchester@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> subject: RE: QNTC and Windows Server 2012
>
>
> We had a meeting earlier this week and I made a few remarks using the 
> phrase "MS-proprietary" ;-)
>
> So one of the PC Admins set up WS4U and after a bunch of twiddling 
> with security we were able to succesfully use a MOUNT, CPY and UNMOUNT 
> command to move some data.
>
> Now I need to do a little research on the viability of doing MOUNT's 
> within QSTRUP and/or doing them dynamically for each application.
>
> Thanks ALL for the help!
>
> Terry